Sicilian 2.d3 e6 3.g3: KIA against the Sicilian
Sicilian: 2.d3 e6 3.g3
Definition
The sequence 1. e4 c5 2. d3 e6 3. g3 is a quiet sideline of the Sicilian Defence that steers play away from the main, heavily-analysed Open Sicilians. By delaying Nf3 and instead preparing a fianchetto with g2–g3, White adopts a set-up often called the King’s Indian Attack against the Sicilian. In ECO it is catalogued under the broad code B50 (Sicilian: lines without …d6 or …Nc6 on move two).
Typical Move Order
A common illustrative sequence runs:
- 1. e4 c5 – The Sicilian Defence.
- 2. d3 – A modest pawn advance, keeping the c1-bishop free.
- …e6 – Black chooses the Paulsen/Scheveningen structure.
- 3. g3 – White announces a kingside fianchetto and a strategic, manoeuvring battle.
Strategic Ideas
- Flexible Development. White can decide later whether to place the queen’s knight on c3 (aiming for d5 breaks) or on d2 (supporting f2–f4).
- Control of the Dark Squares. The fianchettoed bishop on g2 eyes the important d5-square and pressures the long diagonal.
- King-side Expansion. Plans with Nf3, Re1, h4, e5, or f4 resemble the King’s Indian Attack against the French Defence.
- Reduced Theory. By avoiding early Nf3 and d4, White sidesteps a vast amount of Najdorf, Dragon, and Sveshnikov theory.
- Black’s Counterplay. Because the centre is fluid, Black often strikes with …d5 or …b5, exploiting the fact that White has not challenged the centre directly.
Historical & Practical Significance
Although less common than the main Sicilian branches, this line has been adopted by several elite players as a surprise weapon:
- Bobby Fischer used similar KIA structures throughout the 1960s to avoid opponent preparation.
- Magnus Carlsen employed 2. d3 3. g3 versus Sergey Karjakin in the 2019 World Rapid Championship, scoring a smooth win.
- It is popular in rapid and blitz, where forcing variations are less desirable for the side with Black.
Illustrative Games
-
Carlsen – Karjakin, World Rapid 2019
Carlsen’s flexible set-up led to a powerful central pawn majority and queenside weaknesses in Black’s camp.
-
Gufeld – Fischer, Monte Carlo 1967 (simul)
Fischer demonstrated how Black can generate counterplay with …d5, but also how White’s piece co-ordination keeps the position under control.
Typical Plans for Both Sides
- White
- Castle kingside quickly (Bg2, Nf3, O-O).
- Probe the centre with e4–e5 or f2–f4–f5.
- Apply pressure on the queenside dark squares via Qc2, a4, or Nb1–d2–c4.
- Black
- Break with …d5 when tactically feasible.
- Expand on the queenside (…b5, …Rb8, …a5).
- Target the e4-pawn after castling by regrouping pieces to c7, d8, and e7.
Interesting Facts & Anecdotes
- Some databases call the line “Sicilian, Fianchetto Variation”, but club players often say simply “I’m playing a KIA against the Sicilian.”
- The move 2. d3 dates back to 19th-century games; Paul Morphy tried it in offhand play to get his opponents out of book.
- Because the early centre remains closed, the middlegame often features prolonged manoeuvring reminiscent of a reversed King’s Indian Defence.
When to Choose This Line
Opt for 2. d3 3. g3 if you:
- Wish to avoid the memorised theory of Open Sicilians.
- Prefer strategic, slow-burn positions with rich middlegame play.
- Have a repertoire based on the King’s Indian Attack and want a universal system versus several Black defences.
Further Study
Look up games by modern proponents such as Maxime Vachier-Lagrave, Levon Aronian, and Wesley So, who occasionally employ the line in rapid events. Classic references include Anthony Miles’s writings on anti-Sicilian systems.